Tuesday, February 21, 2012

The Realms Thereunder - Day 2

"Oxford is not safe."
- Daniel to creature, p15

This month's CSFF Blog Tour features the first novel in The Ancient Earth trilogy,  The Realms Thereunder, by Ross Lawhead.

Yesterday, my eldest niece supplied her teenage opinion of the book (click Day 1 to read what she had to say); today, I'll discuss several passages from the first quarter of the book -- not to give away too many spoilers, but to share some things that struck me.

First, I like the language. There's a grandness in places, yet a grounded-ness. Not only does it help me visualize the story's world, but fires my imagination, driving me back to all the unfinished tales waiting their writer's return.

Second, I enjoy a well-written prologue. The Realms Thereunder opens with some foreshadowing, a fun bit of storytelling among the patrons of the Swindlestock Tavern -- an excellent and evocative name for such an establishment.

Now, for specific passages from the first 100 pages of the book.

Lawhead keeps the story moving. Description mingles with forward motion, so the reader gets the picture without wading through boggy information. If I hadn't been hooked already, the scene below would have done it:
It had discarded its sunglasses and T-shirt and was crouching on the footpath, half naked and wreathed in shadows.

"Lonely little light," it said. "Dim light, faint light. All alone in a city of one hundred and fifty thousand. A fraction so infinitesimally small, it's hardly worth expressing. Statistically insignificant, equivalent to nothing."

Daniel wanted to reply, to try to deflate its gloating pride, but he was depending on the creature's conceit to survive the fight -- he had to play the role of unsuspecting prey. He set his jaw and narrowed his eyes, bracing himself for the attack. (p13)
The language, the image, the challenge -- I settled in for the ride. The ensuing encounter between Daniel and his foe did not disappoint.

A short time after that incident, the other main character -- Freya -- has a battle of her own, this one verbal and before witnesses. The debate is interesting, and she stands her ground in the face of the Oxford lecturer's mocking, but Freya later wonders if she should have challenged the woman's biased, confined thinking.
Why did she do it? what did it matter what people thought and believed, even if it was a lie? What right did she have to burst the fragile bubble of reality that people surrounded themselves with? So long as they live happily, what does it matter if they live a lie? Ignorance is a blessing. It was futile to try to wake people up, so why did she do it? (p22)
Sleepers are not necessarily grateful for awakenings, rude or gentle. Does that mean, then, they should not be wakened?

Rabbit trail #1: I've thought some of the same things Freya mentioned in the debate about historical  truth we cannot know because documentation doesn't exist, not (as she was arguing) regarding Arthurian legends and British history, but about Biblical history.

Rabbit trail #2: The use on page 18 of "Common Era" by the lecturer caught my attention. "BCE" and "CE" annoy me. I'm still a fan of "BC" and "AD", and I like that Biblical Archeology Review allows contributors to use either the traditional or modern designation, as they prefer.

Ahem. Now, back to our regularly scheduled programming.

old church, Eureka Springs, AR              c. 2011, KB
Chapter 2 of The Realms Thereunder, "The Sleeping Knights", takes the reader back to Daniel's childhood, showing his troubled home life and his awkward friendship with Freya, who at first appears to be the confident one of the two. Roles reverse somewhat on a school field trip when solid, familiar reality -- the world we know -- gives way to the mystery and danger of a world we don't. Years later, as an adult, Freya still struggles with what she experienced then, trying to push it into someplace she can forget, while Daniel's existence is saturated with that other world.

On the school trip, the children enter a tunnel in an old church, and find two knights sleeping in a room carved of stone. At first, Daniel thinks they are models made for "a movie, like Lord of the Rings. They made models like this for that. I saw the special features" (p38). I snorted with laughter when I read this; not only does the LOTR reference up the nerdy-cool factor of the story, but I, too, have watched all the special features on the extra DVDs that accompany the Extended Edition of Peter Jackson's version of the classic trilogy.

The tunnel that appears in an archway, and the waking of the knights by a blast on a horn, reminds me of The Chronicles of Narnia, though the horn blast is hardly effectual-sounding, and the tunnel leads underground rather than into a snowy forest.

The knights' song (p41,42) does triple duty: sets mood, tells story, increases mystery. The fourth verse is my favorite:
Where goest you, little aeðeling,
With father's rusty sword?
'To split the head of a tow-haired man
Who gave and broke his word.'
The story's timeline jumps from present (labeled "Eight Years Ago" / "Now") to the past ("Eight Years Before" / "Before"), but it is by no means confusing or difficult to follow. In the past, Daniel and Freya are schoolchildren, but in the present, they are in their twenties; Freya is at university, but Daniel, after service in the military, is homeless.

There's an added time element when the knights are introduced, for they are from centuries in the past, and yet appear no older than they were when they first fell asleep.
"So when we went through the arch," Daniel said slowly, "we actually entered another world?"

"Not exactly, no," Swiðgar replied. "The place where we slept was not in one world or another. Imagine a tide pool set in the shore of the universe alongside the sea of time -- an eddy where time spins in upon itself. In such a place we remained as we were first laid to rest. All who cross from one world to the next must, by necessity, pass through one of these pools. That is why, when you hear of people returning from one of those other worlds, they have sometimes been gone a day, sometimes a hundred years. There is little accounting for it, but even so, there is reason--" (p69)
The conversation is interrupted by an attack. The enemy is defeated, but the young friends have different reactions: Freya is more uncomfortable and full of dread, while Daniel is intensely interested in the swords and in this strange place.
"Where are we going again?" Daniel asked.

"Niðergeard," Ecgbryt answered in a voice strong with pride. "It is a vast holding beneath the skin of the earth. Its boundaries are not marked, and it sits upon the gates of three hidden worlds. It is the grandest of all earthly cities, yet known to only a few. Its dark spires are seen only by those who are great and dream of a larger greatness." (p73)
And there, dear reader, I shall leave you. Perchance you shall venture to Niðergeard yourself, and soon. 

Click here to obtain a list of other stops along the CSFF Blog Tour, and read other reactions to the novel.

Monday, February 20, 2012

The Realms Thereunder - Day 1

This month's CSFF Blog Tour features The Realms Thereunder, the new fantasy novel by Ross Lawhead, and first in The Ancient Earth trilogy.

Niece #1, fourteen years old this week, got to the book first after it arrived in the mail, and she devoured it inside of twenty-four hours. I thought she composed a pretty good outline in her notes, so she has the privilege of essentially writing my first post of the tour. These notes were composed as she read:
1) Three parallel storylines--three people (Daniel Tully, Freya Reynolds, Alex Simpson) that know a very strange, unusual secret no one can know because no one would believe.
2) Story goes back and forth, past and present, sometimes that can be confusing, but in this case it's just plain good storytelling.
3) Vocab is a bit confusing at moments (casual dialogue; "toilet" means "bathroom" -- took me a minute), but the setting is Great Britain.
4) Fourth storyline -- (Robin Ploughwright) pretty sure he's a bad guy?
5) Some funny parts -- good!
6) Names are a little weird, but cool, and (they) fit the story.
7) Adventurous and interesting
8) A little confusing in the parts that deal with Freya
9) The description of the days Daniel spends at the wood-burner's hut is a little dull
10) Overall, though, an interesting read. I'd like to read the next two (books) as well.
 When I asked her if she would like to expand on her original thoughts, she said, "I know my notes are pretty general, but I was just writing the basic feeling the book gave me, not noting the structure or grammar or anything like that. Just my general impressions. Basically, I'm reading from the perspective of a 14-year-old kid, not from someone reviewing the book, just as a form of entertainment for me. And it is an excellent story!"

So, folks, there ya have it. More about my grownup but no less enthusiastic response in the following two days.

Meantime, check out these stops of the tour for other perspectives:
Gillian Adams
Red Bissell
Keanan Brand
Beckie Burnham
Melissa Carswell
Jeff Chapman
CSFF Blog Tour
Theresa Dunlap
Emmalyn Edwards
April Erwin
Victor Gentile
Tori Greene
Nikole Hahn
Ryan Heart
Bruce Hennigan
Timothy Hicks
Christopher Hopper
Jason Joyner
Carol Keen
Krystine Kercher
Rebekah Loper
Shannon McDermott
Rebecca LuElla Miller
Mirriam Neal
Eve Nielsen
John W. Otte
Donita K. Paul
Joan Nienhuis
Crista Richey
Sarah Sawyer
Chawna Schroeder
Kathleen Smith
Donna Swanson
Rachel Starr Thomson
Steve Trower
Fred Warren
Dona Watson
Nicole White
Rachel Wyant

Wednesday, February 1, 2012

Tough Love and Manifesto

This is a re-post from April 2009, when I shared a couple of poems for National Poetry Month. It's been a while -- a year, maybe longer -- since I've written any poetry, but it's something that has to strike me, not something I tend to approach as I do fiction: almost daily, and often with a hammer. ( :/ )
Here are a couple of angst-y pieces, inspired by two different people, years apart, and both poems have won awards. (I can't recall the years or the contests. I did pocket the money, though!) Call the first poem an act of tough love, and the second a manifesto.


She is a choking vine,
twining my limbs,
wrapping my throat,
squeezing my strength
as if I am the soil that succors her roots.

I was, at first,
a sympathetic, willing trellis,
thinking my role temporary,
like a stake to guide a sapling,
but she will not let go.

Sun and shade equally strike,
yet she claims the lesser share,
complaining her weakness, her lack,
her compromise—
shadowing me as she seeks more light.

I am dying,
throttled by her need.
Freeing my hand, I tear at her tendrils;
broken stems bleed on my skin.
Remnants of her cling to my clothes.

She cries her shock and anger,
pleas the length of friendship,
but I reck not her arguments,
turn from her tilting form,
and say, “Stand.”


The Flood

You left
a high-water mark
on the walls of my heart--
a crusted undulating line
that marks the end
of the rising filthy tide
of pollution I once called

of receding emotion
lap against my reality boots
and cover the toes,
but I feel nothing,
wading through the muck and
debris like Peter walked on

If I
look down, I might sink
into that miserable morass
of self-pity and doubt,
mourning the lost years
and cursing you for taking them,
for making the dreams

of memory bleach
saturate the walls and wash away
disease, letting the clean things shine through,
leaving behind the bones of a house
in which laughter will ring